Dilan's+Blueprint

OKAY. LOOKS WELL THOUGHT OUT. ** Test structure ** 1. Number of parts : There are 5 parts. 2. Relevance of parts to purpose of test I want my students to infer the knowledge, not to take it directly from the question. Students’ interpretation is important and test was prepared according to this objective. 3. Sequence of parts and range of lower- to higher-level thinking tasks. It is arranged as lower- to higher-level thinking tasks. 4. Relative importance of parts (weighting in terms of overall test score) “Reading of tables” parts and reading part are more important in terms of score 5. Number of tasks per part: , There is one task each except for second part( there are two) To test students’ comparative and superlative knowledge The design of the test includes real-like exercises and real-like people who are put in an usual situations I will give 50 minutes The all answers expected to be answered are taught, however some parts most probably will be done only certain students. 6. Scoring method:  Some questions can be done by all students, few questions can be done by good students, 2 or 3 questions can be only done by students who really comprehend the topic and good at using it. 1. White space: there are enough space for drafting 2. Ordering between sections: they are ordered from easy to difficult 3. Difficulty ordering (difficult to easy): easy to difficult 4. Reactive ordering : reading, then writing
 * Test specifications **
 * 1) Purpose:
 * 1) Links to of construct(s)
 * 2) Setting (in terms of context and authenticity):
 * 1) Timing:
 * 1) Characteristic of input and expected output:
 * Layout considerations **