emrecan+evaluation+and+analysis

=__Practicality__= =·   It is too easy to prepare, administer, mark and score the test. Additionally, it takes too short time to do the test.= =·   However, the scoring method isn’t included and there is no example for the task.= = = =__Reliability__= =·   Scoring is quite reliable, since there are 20 questions and the overall score is 20 points and I think each of them is 1 point. Therefore, it the answer is true, the students get 1 point, if not they get zero. So, the scoring method is quite clear and reliable.= =·   The test measures knowledge of students on the difference between adverbs adjectives, but it doesn’t measure their vocabulary knowledge and productive skills, as well as receptive ones.= =·   There isn’t enough variety in the test, so we can’t say it addresses everyone or it measures all language abilities.= = = =Validity= =__Authenticity__= =__Washback__=
 * =In addition, he thinks that an opportunity to cheat is minimized, but I think that it’s too easy to cheat even by just guessing from 2 options.=
 * =Face validity is really good, since the space and short type of questions will make students feel relax and see it as an easy task that they can handle easily. Also, students can understand easily what to do when they look at the test.=
 * =However, the test doesn’t measure all aspects of language such as skills which lowers the validity feature of the test.=
 * =Unlike Emrecan asserts, the questions aren’t related with real life situations, conversely, they are extracted sentences which have nothing from everyday situations.=
 * =In my opinion, the washback would be positive as Emrecan stated. Because it is a short and simple test for them, I think a B1/B2 level student can do much more than just choosing 1 right answer from 2 options.=